The issue of executions in Iran is not an abstract political debate. It is a living presence, a constant shadow that seeps into people’s daily lives, their language, their memory, and even their imagination, often without them realizing it. In some cities, there are even places named after it, like "Execution Square" in Mashhad.
For anyone who grew up under the Islamic Republic, state violence is not distant or abstract. It is part of the daily flow of life, as ordinary and unavoidable as changes in the weather. Those who remember the 1979 revolution probably also remember the images of public executions, the “revolutionary” ones. But the decades after were no better. Executions have always stayed continuous, unending.
To understand the effects of executions, we spoke with someone for whom it has been a lifelong concern, Golnoosh.
Marjane Satrapi, the author of the graphic novel Persepolis, tells the story of her uncle Anoosh, a man who used to visit their home and then one day vanished. Later, she found out he had been executed. Golnoosh’s story begins in almost the same way.
Almost every family, every generation, every community in Iran has somehow been touched by execution.
If it has not happened to a relative, then to a friend, a neighbor, a classmate, or maybe the construction worker who once came to fix the roof.
When confronted by something painful, you can turn away from it or act like it is not there. But Golnoosh could not look away.
As a teenager, she once met a quiet girl with heavy makeup at a party. Someone whispered that both of the girl’s parents had been executed in the '80s.
Golnoosh’s experience is like a mirror for a generation that slowly realized execution is not just an event, but part of the structure of the system itself, like military parades, school uniforms, or the morning call to prayer.
For her, this understanding deepened after the executions of two men following the 2009 Green Movement protests, accused of being monarchists.
Then came other names, carrying both grief and anger: Farzad Kamangar, Shirin Alam-Houli, Zanyar and his brother, Loghman Moradi, Navid Afkari, Reyhaneh Jabbari, Atefeh, Delara, Shahla...
When the Women, Life, Freedom movement began after Jina (Mahsa) Amini’s death-in-custody, Golnoosh felt the nightmare returning.
She says the regime has always used executions as a language of threat.
Most executions in Iran are for drug-related charges, about half of them. The rest are for murder, political, religious, or so-called “security” crimes. The highest numbers are among the Baluch, the most disadvantaged and marginalized population in Iran. Many of the drug-related executions are also rooted in poverty, where someone takes the blame for another’s crime in exchange for money to feed their family or to protect someone higher up.
In one case, a father and son were executed for drug charges in southern Iran, twenty years apart, the clearest symbol that executions do not stop crime or prevent anything.
So many images remain, like that of a teenage boy sentenced to death for “sodomy,” who, just minutes before his execution, rested his head innocently on his executioner’s shoulder.
Every execution releases poison into the air. Its violence spreads like a toxin, touching the guards, the hangmen, the families, the onlookers.
Each of them carries a fragment of that violence inside, a mark that will never truly fade.
Recently someone told me that saying no to the death penalty is just a kind of reformism. But execution is not just a policy, it is one of the main pillars of this regime. Without executions and gender discrimination, what would the Islamic Republic even be?
The Islamic Republic will not stop executing because someone politely asks it to. But when people take away its control over the story, when they tell what happens, killing becomes harder.
For months we knew that two men, Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani, had been sentenced to death for political reasons.
But when Mehdi’s daughter, Maryam Hassani, publicly announced that her father and Mr. Ehsani had been taken to solitary, the news spread quickly across social media. Prisoners protested inside, and people outside filled the online space with outrage, and as a result, the two were returned to their ward.
It took the authorities eight months, under strange and costly conditions, to isolate them again, move them to different wards, and finally prepare for their executions.
Eight months.
The executions were deeply heartbreaking. None of us will forget Maryam Hassani’s voice and face when she confirmed her father’s death. But those eight months were also a kind of collective act, born from people’s unity and persistence.
Maryam later spoke about it in an interview with activist Fariba Balouch.
When it came to the young men from Isfahan, people went to the prison gates for two or three nights. But on the final night, a weekend night, people did not go, and the executions went ahead.
These are not two separate societies.
We have to remember what is allowed and what is costly, what the system rewards, and what it fears.
This is a bitter and exhausting conversation. Living consciously in an era of executions comes with a price.
The six Arab men, Ali Majdam, Mohammadreza Moghadam, Moein Khanfari, Habib Daris, Adnan Ghabishavi, and Salem Mousavi, and Saman, were all killed just days before the World Day Against the Death Penalty.
Execution is never normal.
And we have to pay the cost of making sure it never becomes something ordinary.
To resist execution is to defend humanity, to refuse to look away, to speak their names, to mourn, and to remember.
So that one day, we may be able to see each other again.